Churches | Northeastern NY
Tuesday, 15 April 2014 18:11

Church Directory

Written by
Rate this item
(1 Vote)
Read 8119542 times
More in this category: « Our Churches

577186 comments

  • Comment Link securityholes.science Saturday, 07 December 2024 03:14 posted by securityholes.science

    Guide To Car Key Repairs Near Me: The Intermediate Guide
    Towards Car Key Repairs Near Me car Key repairs near Me (securityholes.science)

  • Comment Link qiziqarli.Net Saturday, 07 December 2024 03:14 posted by qiziqarli.Net

    14 Common Misconceptions About Trucking Accident Attorneys trucking accidents attorneys (qiziqarli.Net)

  • Comment Link slot online dola4d Saturday, 07 December 2024 03:14 posted by slot online dola4d

    Pretty part of content. I simply stumbled upon your blog and in accession capital to say that I get in fact enjoyed account your weblog posts.
    Any way I'll be subscribing on your feeds or even I achievement you access constantly fast.

  • Comment Link Situs Togel Terpercaya Saturday, 07 December 2024 03:14 posted by Situs Togel Terpercaya

    15 Reasons Not To Overlook Daftar Situs Togel Situs Togel
    Terpercaya

  • Comment Link Cheap Sofas for sale Saturday, 07 December 2024 03:13 posted by Cheap Sofas for sale

    The 10 Most Terrifying Things About Cheap
    Sofas For Sale Cheap Sofas for sale

  • Comment Link เยอบีร่า ความหมาย Saturday, 07 December 2024 03:12 posted by เยอบีร่า ความหมาย

    Do Greens and crossbenchers who claim that transparency
    and integrity is at the heart of their reason for entering Parliament in the
    first place hear themselves?

    In the past few days they have mounted self-serving arguments against
    proposed electoral reforms that the major parties look set to come together to support.


    The reforms include caps for how much money wealthy individuals can donate, caps on the amount candidates can spend in individual electorates to prevent the equivalent of an arms race,
    and a $90million limit on what any party can spend at an election - actually less than the
    major parties currently spend.

    The proposed new laws also include lower disclosure thresholds for donations,
    thus increasing the transparency of who makes political donations
    in the first place.

    So the wealthy wont be able to hide behind anonymity while using their cash to influence election outcomes - and the extent to which they can use their wealth
    at all will be limited.

    The bill will further improve transparency by also increasing the speed and frequency that disclosures of donations need to
    be made.

    At present we have the absurd situation in which donations get made - but you only find out the
    details of who has given what to whom many months later,
    well after elections are won and lost.

    In other words, what is broadly being proposed will
    result in much greater transparency and far less
    big money being injected into campaigning by the wealthy.





    Teal Kylea Tink claimed the major parties were 'running scared' with the policy and warned the
    reform would 'not stop the rot' 











    Greens senate leader Larissa Waters (left) fired a warning shot - saying if it serves
    only the major parties 'it's a rort, not reform'. Teal independent ACT senator David Pocock (right) said: 'What seems to be happening is a major-party stitch-up'

    Anyone donating more than $1,000 to a political party, as
    opposed to $16,000 under the current rules, will need to disclose having done so.
    And how much they can donate will be capped.

    Yet the Greens and Teals have quickly condemned the proposed new laws, labeling them a 'stitch-up', 'outrageous' and 'a rort, not a reform'. 

    They have lost their collective minds after finding out that Labor's proposal just
    might secure the support of the opposition.

    I had to double check who was criticising what exactly before even starting to write this column.

    Because I had assumed - incorrectly - that these important transparency
    measures stamping out the influence of the wealthy must have been proposed by the virtue-signalling Greens or the corruption-fighting
    Teals, in a united crossbench effort to drag the major parties closer to accountability.


    More fool me.

    The bill, designed to clean up a rotten system, is being put forward by Labor and is opposed by a growing cabal of
    crossbenchers.

    It makes you wonder what they have to hide. Put simply, the
    Greens and Teals doth protest too much on this issue.




    Labor is thought to be trying to muscle out major political donors such as Clive Palmer





    Another potential target of the laws is businessman and Teal funder Simon Holmes à Court





    The Greens have taken massive donations in the past, contrary to their irregular calls to tighten donations
    rules (Greens leader Adam Bandt and Senator Mehreen Faruqi are
    pictured)

    The major parties have long complained about the influence the likes of
    Simon Holmes à Court wields behind the scenes amongst the
    Teals. 

    And we know the Greens have taken massive donations from the wealthy in the
    past, contrary to their irregular calls to tighten donations rules.


    Now that tangible change has been proposed, these bastions of virtue
    are running a mile from reforms that will curtail dark art of
    political donations.

    The Labor government isn't even seeking for these transparency rules to take effect immediately,
    by the way. It won't be some sort of quick-paced power play before the
    next election designed to catch the crossbench out.


    They are aiming for implementation by 2026, giving everyone enough time to absorb and understand the changes before preparing for
    them.

    Don't get me wrong, no deal has yet been done between Labor and the Coalition. I imagine the opposition want to go over
    the laws with a fine tooth comb.

    As they should - because it certainly isn't beyond Labor to include hidden one-party advantages in the proposed design which would create loopholes only the
    unions are capable of taking advantage of, therefore disadvantaging the Coalition electorally in the years to come.



    But short of such baked-in trickiness scuttling a
    deal to get these proposed laws implemented, the crossbench should offer their support, not
    cynical opposition, to what is being advocated for.


    They might even be able to offer something worthwhile that could be incorporated in the package.


    To not do so exposes their utter hypocrisy and blowhard false commentary about being in politics to 'clean things
    up'.

  • Comment Link best rated Cribs Saturday, 07 December 2024 03:12 posted by best rated Cribs

    10 Wrong Answers To Common Cribs Questions: Do You Know The Right Ones?
    best rated Cribs

  • Comment Link Adeline Saturday, 07 December 2024 03:08 posted by Adeline

    The No. Question Everybody Working In Double Pushchair
    3 Wheeler Must Know How To Answer 3 wheel buggies, Adeline,

  • Comment Link Lexus key maker Saturday, 07 December 2024 03:08 posted by Lexus key maker

    You'll Never Guess This Lexus Key Maker's Secrets Lexus key
    maker

  • Comment Link Theron Saturday, 07 December 2024 03:08 posted by Theron

    See What Coffee Machines With Pods Tricks The Celebs Are Using coffee machines
    with pods (Theron)

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.